Gay marriage ban fails by wide margin in Senate

By LAURIE KELLMAN

Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON The Senate

rejected a constitutional amendment

to ban gay marriage by a

wide margin Wednesday, delivering

a stinging defeat to President

Bush and other Republicans who

hope the issue will rally GOP voters

for the November elections.

The senators’ vote was 49-48 to

limit debate and bring the amendment

to a yes-or-no decision. That

was 11 short of the 60 needed,

killing the measure in the Senate

for this year.

Bush suggested the ban was

proper and its time would still

come. He said, “Our nation’s

founders set a high bar for

amending our Constitution and

history has shown us that it can

take several tries before an

amendment builds the two-thirds

support it needs in both houses of

Congress.”

Democrats suggested it was

all about conservative politics.

“Why is it when Republicans

are all for reducing the federal

government’s impact on people’s

lives until it comes to these stinging

litmus test issues, whether

gay marriage or end of life they

suddenly want the federal government

to intervene?” asked Sen.

Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif. “It

makes no sense other than throwing

red meat to a certain constituency.”

The 49 votes to keep the

amendment alive were one more

than the measure received the

last time the Senate voted, in

2004. Proponents had predicted

the amendment would get at least

a 51-vote majority in the 100-

member Senate with the gain four

Republican seats since then.

It takes two-thirds majorities

in both houses of Congress to

send a proposed amendment to

the states for ratification. The

House will take up the issue next

month.

Despite the defeat, amendment

backers insisted progress

had been made because the

debate over three days raised the

issue’s profile and will force candidates

to answer for their votes

on the campaign trail.

“Eventually, Congress is going

to have to catch up to the wisdom

of the American people or the

American people will change

Congress for the better,” said

Sen. David Vitter, R-La.

“We’re not going to stop until

marriage between a man and a

woman is protected,” said Sen.

Sam Brownback, R-Kan.

Most bitter to the amendments’

authors was the loss of

support in their own GOP caucus.

Two Republicans changed their

votes from yes in 2004 to no this

time: Judd Gregg of New

Hampshire and Arlen Specter of

Pennsylvania. Chuck Hagel of

Nebraska did not vote Wednesday

because he was traveling with

Bush.

All told, seven Republicans

voted to kill the amendment. The

five others were Lincoln Chafee

of Rhode Island, Susan Collins of

Maine, John McCain of Arizona,

Olympia Snowe of Maine and

John Sununu of New Hampshire.

Gregg said that in 2004, he

believed a Massachusetts

Supreme Court decision legalizing

same-sex marriage in that state

would undermine the authority of

other states, like his, to prohibit

such unions.

“Fortunately, such legal pandemonium

has not ensued,”

Gregg said. “The past two years

have shown that federalism, not

more federal laws, is a viable and

preferable approach.”

A majority of Americans

define marriage as a union of a

man and a woman, as the proposed

amendment does, according

to a poll out this week by ABC

News. But an equal majority

oppose amending the Constitution

over the issue, the poll found.

The tally Wednesday put the

ban 18 votes short of the 67 needed

for the Senate to approve a

constitutional amendment.

Supporters of the amendment

acknowledged disappointment in

the vote and, to some extent,

Bush’s advocacy. “He could have

done more, but he doesn’t have a

vote in this one,” Brownback said

of the president.

Forty-five of the 50 states have

acted to define traditional marriage

in ways that would ban

same-sex marriage 19 with

state constitutional amendments

and 26 with statutes.

The proposed federal amendment

would prohibit states from

recognizing same-sex marriages.

After approval by Congress, it

would have to be ratified by at

least 38 state legislatures.

Sen. Ben Nelson of Nebraska

was the only Senate Democrat

who supported the amendment.

Democrat Robert Byrd of West

Virginia voted “yes” on

Wednesday’s motion to move forward

with an up-or-down vote on

the amendment but said he

opposed the measure itself.

Three senators did not vote:

Democrats Christopher Dodd of

Connecticut and John Rockefeller

of West Virginia as well as

Republican Hagel of Nebraska.