IInitiative 161 is bad for Montana

IInitiative 161 is bad

for Montana

Editor:

As a private property owner, I do not support Initiative 161.

Yes, I signed a petition last winter to put the initiative on the November ballot, but the following day I called the commitee and was assured my signiture would be promptly removed. I was told it was not.

I will actively campaign against this infringement and more government takeover of our rights as a private landowner and an American. Next, they'll take our guns, and we won't be able hunt anywhere.

Marla J. Boyce

Havre

(I-161 abolishes outfitter-sponsored hunting licenses, replacing them with nonresident licenses, and it increases fees for out-of-staters seeking Montana hunting license.)

Editor:

As a private property owner, I do not support Initiative 161.

Yes, I signed a petition last winter to put the initiative on the November ballot, but the following day I called the commitee and was assured my signiture would be promptly removed. I was told it was not.

I will actively campaign against this infringement and more government takeover of our rights as a private landowner and an American. Next, they'll take our guns, and we won't be able hunt anywhere.

Marla J. Boyce

Havre

(I-161 abolishes outfitter-sponsored hunting licenses, replacing them with nonresident licenses, and it increases fees for out-of-staters seeking Montana hunting license.)